Maximum gain passive: >+24dBu
Maximum gain active circuits (gain/MS/Blend): +24dBu

Even though it's no problem to run at higher gains, we suggest to run at max +20dBu, or even better +18dBu. This will result in the most transparent and best sound overall for most equipment.

We are sorry to inform you that this is physically not possible.  When you have a IM2.x (so 2 units high) for each insert you will need 4 XLR's, so for 8 inserts you will need 8 x 4 = 32XLR's for just the inserts. Together with the inputs and outputs on a IM2.x makes a total of 40 XLR's. That will simply not fit a 2u backpanel. For a 1u unit with 6 inserts it's even worse. 

That is why we use DB25 connectors, since each DB25 basically has 8 XLR's at a fraction of the footprint. An 8 insert unit with XLR would need to be at least 3U high and a 1U unit would simply not even excist. Some people are afraid of more crosstalk with DB25, but this is not true.

Our products follow the analog Tascam DB25/DSUB standard which are harder to get then the digital version. A lot of times these cables are custom made or need to be modified (swap XLR's). That is why we can also deliver Grimm Audio cables which are pretty much the best cables you can get for a decent price and available at the exact lengths you need.

Grimm Audio TPR ‘Twisted Pair Reference’ cables are developed with physics in mind. Their design focuses on high RF immunity and low microphonics. The perfect symmetry of the cross-section and heavy shielding contribute to high RF immunity. Low microphonics is provided by a special interface layer under the shield and other construction details.

TPR delivers the most natural and least coloured transfer available. Get reference quality for a mainstream price.

• More info and prices about the Grimm cables can be found here
• More info on the DB25 analog standard can be found here
  

Our consoles follow the analog DB25 tascam standard.

One DB25 sub cable holds 2 inserts, so for a console with 8 inserts you will need 4x DB25 sub cables. There are 2 different standards for DB25 sub cables, the digital and analog version. The pinout and channel configuration is exactly the same but the input/output (so the XLR’s) are reversed. So if you buy the digital version with 4x male, 4x female XLR, you have to swap all the XLR connectors.

This is the correct channel and send/return schematic:

Insert 1:
channel1 insert 1 left send (male XLR)
channel2 insert 1 right send (male XLR)
channel5 insert 1 left return (female XLR)
channel6 insert 1 right return (female XLR)

Insert 2:
channel3 insert 2 left send (male XLR)
channel4 insert 2 right send (male XLR)
channel7 insert 2 left return (female XLR)
channel8 insert 2 right return (female XLR)

We made a document with info and options, you can download it here.

This image shows the right pinout and connections.

We decided to go for a different then the one knob wet/dry knob approach for various reasons. After research with various well-known mastering-engineers, we all agreed that going for 2 controls (1x wet, 1x dry) is the best solution.

Most parallel processing uses one control for blending from wet to dry and uses a potmeter with percentages instead of dB's. The blend circuit we designed uses two separate controls for both wet and dry with stepped switches instead of one potmeter. The first steps on the stepped attenuators have 1 dB per step and the last steps have more course steps, the lowest step is -33dB. The off position mutes the wet or dry signal. This approach means, no channel imbalance, perfect recall, way better control and dB's instead of percentages. Another advantage is that it's pretty much impossible to AB between parallel processing and regular with one knob because there will always be a gain difference. With 2 controls you can adjust the dry and wet so that it's level-matched compared to the passive mode. You can then simply level-matched AB by pressing the blend button.

DuTCH.audio is the first and only company in the world offering this kind of parallel processing approach.

There are 2 different versions available for the IM1.1, IM1.2, IM2.1 and IM2.3, the S-verion and the bypass gain compensation (non S) version. Let me explain the difference.

Bypass gain compensation:
The bypass gain compensation has a potmeter and is used to compensate for gain loss when the inserts are bypassed. When you press the 'bypass offset' button all inserts will be bypassed and the gain compensation becomes active. With the potmeter you can compensate for the gain loss with a range of -10dB to +10dB *. This will be really handy for quick level compensated AB'ing between source and master with the press of just one button. The bypass gain compensation can not be used as an active output gain.

* older series had a gain range of -2 to +8dB

S-version (stepped output gain):
The S-version has a 23 steps bypassable active gain on the output with 0.5dB per step (range +/- 5.5dB) or switchable 0.25dB  per step (range +/- 2.75dB). You can use this to drive the IM output into your AD at the exact gain you want. The gain can also be used to compensate for gain loss when bypassing the inserts, but you have to press two buttons (ins bypass and active gain) at the same time. The gain range is also more limited then the bypass gain compensation.

It's quite easy to label the pushswitches to your liking, it just needs a bit of practice. That is why we made this small manual in PDF format on how to do it properly. 

Since most units will end up in a mastering environment and as being a 'picky mastering-engineer' myself I take great care in picking the best parts. To give you some examples of the parts used:

• Blore edwards military grade stepped switches
• Sturdy industrial pushswitches (used in airplanes and nuclear powerplants)
• Goldplated neutrik XLR's
• Goldplated industrial wurth DB25 connectors
• Meanwell industrial SMPS with extra regulators and filtering
• Omron hi-sensitive industrial relays
• THAT and Analog Devices opamps
• Panasonic FC elco's
• Wima poly caps
• Resistors with 1% (matched) or 0.1/0.5% (attenuators) tolerance
• Audiophile silver solder throughout
• Powdercoated frontpanel with laserengraving instead of (less durable) printing

Yes, that's possible though it's not always a good idea to just 'pop in' some other opamps. All opamps have their cons and pro's and some of them work great in certain circuits while they sound and behave differently in other circuits. We did a lot of research on opamps and found that Analog Devices LT1468 to sound the best in the circuits we use. That is why we picked these opamps as our default opamps. All other circuits make use of THAT chips.

Our machines are build around passive parts, but some parts are using active circuitry, like the active in/output, MS section and parallel/blend option. We make use of high quality THAT chips for that.